Analisis Saham PT Maharaksa Biru Energi Tbk (OASA) Per Q3 2025 (Update Desember)
9 mins

Analisis mendalam saham OASA per kuartal 3 2025 dengan update manajemen Desember 2025. Fokus pada transformasi bisnis ke energi terbarukan, kinerja keuangan, risiko, dan rekomendasi investasi.

Disclaimer:

Analisis ini bukan nasihat investasi. Saham berisiko tinggi—lakukan riset mandiri (DYOR - Do Your Own Research) dan konsultasi dengan penasihat keuangan berlisensi sebelum mengambil keputusan. Hasil masa lalu tidak menjamin kinerja masa depan.

Tanggal Analisis: 29 Desember 2025
Harga Saat Ini: Rp 242 per lembar
Ticker: OASA (Bursa Efek Indonesia)
Nama Perusahaan: PT Maharaksa Biru Energi Tbk
Sektor: Energi Terbarukan & Konstruksi - Biomassa, Waste-to-Energy (WtE), Engineering & Construction Services
Nilai Pasar: Rp 1.536 Miliar
Jumlah Saham Beredar: 6,35 Miliar lembar


🔴 RINGKASAN EKSEKUTIF & REKOMENDASI - AVOID / HOLD (SPECULATIVE TRANSFORMATION DENGAN RISIKO SANGAT TINGGI)h2

Rating: 🔴 AVOID / HOLD (untuk risk-taker saja) (Perusahaan Transformasi dari Konstruksi ke Green Energy, Sedang Loss-Making, Negative Cash Flow, Weak Fundamental, Tapi Growth Story Jelas, Government Support, Timing Execution Uncertain, Financial Risk Tinggi)

OASA adalah perusahaan transformasi dari jasa konstruksi telco tower menuju pemain energi terbarukan (biomassa, waste-to-energy). Kondisi finansial kritis: TTM loss Rp (77)M, margin negatif -162%, OCF negative Rp (25)M, Altman 8,19 distress zone, interest coverage negative. TAPI momentum positif terlihat: K3 2025 swing profit Rp 2,1M, capex 2025 minimal (Rp < 500jt) untuk persiapan, capex 2026 akan >Rp 100M untuk PSEL project. Strategi: Waste-to-Energy plant di Tangerang Selatan target operasi 2028, full ramp 2029. Harga Rp 242 adalah speculation play untuk “green energy + government support” narrative, tapi eksekusi sangat uncertain dan financial risk sangat tinggi.

Status Kini (Data Kuartal 3 2025 & Update Manajemen Desember 2025):

ItemNilaiKeterangan
Pendapatan TTM (Est)Rp 47 MiliarLow, dari carry-over & biomassa
Laba Kotor TTMRp (8) MiliarNegative
EBITDA TTMRp (38) MiliarNEGATIVE EBITDA
Laba Bersih TTMRp (77) MiliarLOSS
Margin Bersih TTM-162%DEEPLY NEGATIVE
K3 2025 ProfitRp 2,1 MiliarSwing positive (momentum)
Arus Kas Operasi TTMRp (25) MiliarNEGATIVE
Arus Kas Bebas TTMRp 24 MiliarPositive tapi misleading
Capex 2025< Rp 500 JutaMinimal (project prep stage)
Capex 2026 Plan>Rp 100 MiliarPSEL project begins
D/E Ratio0,03xVery low (asset-light)
Altman Score8,19DISTRESS ZONE

Profil Transformasi & Risiko:

  1. 🔴 Loss-making fundamental - TTM loss Rp (77)M, negative EBITDA, OCF negative (operasional broken)
  2. 🟡 Swing profit K3 2025 - Rp 2,1M dari carry-over projects (momentum but temporary)
  3. 🔴 Negative cash flow - Burning cash from operations (unsustainable without financing)
  4. 🟡 Government support clear - Waste-to-Energy project aligned dengan national waste management agenda
  5. 🟡 Capex plan significant - 2026+ >Rp 100M annually untuk PSEL Tangerang Selatan
  6. 🔴 Execution risk extreme - 3+ tahun untuk project operational (2028), lots can go wrong
  7. 🟡 Dilution planned - Private placement untuk capex financing (shareholder dilution risk)
  8. 🟡 Price momentum - Up +76,64% 3 tahun (speculation, not fundamental)

Kesimpulan Awal: OASA adalah extremely risky transformation story dengan negative fundamentals sekarang tapi potential upside jika government waste-to-energy agenda materializes - perusahaan yang loss-making, cash burning, tapi strategically positioning untuk green energy boom. Cocok HANYA untuk speculative traders/believers dalam Indonesian waste-to-energy potential dengan HIGH risk tolerance. TIDAK recommended untuk conservative investor.


TAHAP 1: VERIFIKASI DATA & PENILAIAN AWALh2

A. Data Keuangan dari Lampiran (Per 29 Desember 2025)h3

  • Revenue TTM Rp 47M ÷ Saham 6,35B = Rp 7,38 per saham RPS (matches Revenue Per Share TTM 7,38) ✓
  • Net loss Rp (77)M ÷ Saham 6,35B = Rp (12,10) per saham EPS (matches approx -12,10) ✓

Konversi VERIFIED BENAR

Laporan Laba Rugi (TTM):

MetrikTTMK3 2025K3 2024K2 2025K1 2025
Pendapatan47 Miliar~7-10M (est)0(180)M(8)M
Laba Kotor(8) MiliarPositive swingLossLossLoss
Laba Bersih(77) Miliar2,1 Miliar ✓(435)M(7)M loss(8)M

⚠️ TTM loss Rp (77)M - company deeply unprofitable overall.

K3 2025 swing positive Rp 2,1M - dari carry-over konstruksi (one-time item).

🔴 K2 2025 loss Rp (180)M extreme - negative spike (unusual).

Metrik Per Saham:

MetrikNilai
EPS (TTM)Rp (12,10)
EPS (Annual)Rp (2,80)
Revenue Per Share (TTM)Rp 7,38
Kas Per SahamRp 6,85
Nilai Buku Per SahamRp 93,14
FCF Per Saham (TTM)Rp 3,81

🔴 EPS negative Rp (12,10) → Harga Rp 242 / EPS (-12,10) = NEGATIVE P/E (loss company).

🟡 P/B Rp 242 / Rp 93,14 book = 2,60x - High premium untuk loss company (speculation).

🔴 FCF positive Rp 24M tapi misleading (dari financing activities, not operational).

Neraca (Kuartal 3 2025):

ItemNilai (Rp Miliar)
Kas44 Miliar
Total Aset668 Miliar
Total Liabilitas79 Miliar
Total Ekuitas591 Miliar
Utang Jangka Panjang0 (none)
Utang Jangka Pendek17 Miliar
Total Utang17 Miliar
Net Cash27 Miliar (positive!)
Modal Kerja114 Miliar

Net cash position Rp 27M - POSITIVE (bright spot).

D/E 0,03x very low - minimal leverage (conservative balance sheet).

Working capital Rp 114M - adequate short-term buffer.

🟡 Total aset hanya Rp 668M - small company, asset-light model.

Arus Kas (TTM):

KomponenRp Miliar
Arus dari Operasi(25) ❌
Arus dari Investasi50
Arus Kas Bebas24 ✓
Arus dari Pendanaan(42)

🔴 OCF negative Rp (25)M - operational cash burning.

🟡 FCF positive Rp 24M tapi dari investing activities (financing, not sustainable).

🔴 Financing negative Rp (42)M - cash outflow (paying back obligations).

Valuasi (pada harga Rp 242):

MetrikNilaiPenilaian
P/E (TTM)NEGATIVE🔴 Loss (N/A)
P/B2,60x🔴 HIGH untuk loss company
P/S32,80x🔴 EXTREMELY HIGH
EV/EBITDA(40,11)🔴 Negative (loss)
Price-to-FCF63,45x🔴 VERY HIGH

🔴 VALUATION EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE FOR LOSS-MAKING COMPANY - P/S 32,80x absurd, P/B 2,60x high for fundamentally broken company.

Market pricing in MASSIVE transformation potential.

Profitabilitas (Kuartal 3 2025):

Margin%
Gross Margin25,26%
Operating Margin31,25%
Net Profit Margin35,07%

⚠️ Margins positive in K3 but this is from one-time carry-over projects (high margin ending), not sustainable.

Pertumbuhan:

Metrik% YoY
Revenue-42,38% ❌
Gross Profit-73,54% ❌
Net Income595,71% ✓ (from base loss)

🔴 Revenue declining -42% YoY - shrinking operational base.

Net income +595% - but from swing out of bigger loss (not meaningful).

Kesehatan Keuangan:

MetrikNilaiStatus
Current Ratio2,84x✓ Good
Quick Ratio2,84x✓ Good
D/E0,03x✓ Very low
Interest Coverage-15,12🔴 NEGATIVE
Altman Score8,19🔴 DISTRESS
FCF Quarter(36) Miliar🔴 Negative

🔴 Altman 8,19 = FINANCIAL DISTRESS ZONE - company in financial difficulty (despite positive net cash position).

🔴 Interest coverage negative - cannot service any debt from earnings.

Current ratio 2,84x good - short-term liquidity ok.

Efektivitas Manajemen:

MetrikNilai
ROA-11,50%
ROE-12,99%
ROIC-8,06%

🔴 ALL RETURNS NEGATIVE - destroying shareholder value.


B. Konteks Operasional & Strategi Transformasih3

Portfolio Bisnis OASA:

  1. Konstruksi & Jasa Engineering (Legacy/Declining)

    • PT Telesys Indonesia (anak usaha) - jasa konsultansi & konstruksi telco tower
    • Kontribusi 2025: Terbesar dari carry-over 2024 projects
    • Margin: ~25-30% historis
    • Trend: Declining (telco tower saturated, market mature)
  2. Biomassa (Growing But Small)

    • PT Mentari Biru Biomassa - biomassa energy
    • Produk: Wood pellet, biomassa power
    • 2025 kontribusi: Small (capex minimal Rp < 500j)
    • Margin: Expected 15-20% (better than construction)
  3. Waste-to-Energy (WtE) - STRATEGIC FOCUS

    • Proyek PSEL (Pengolahan Sampah Energi Listrik) Tangerang Selatan
    • Deskripsi: Plant pengolahan limbah menjadi energi listrik
    • Capex 2026+: >Rp 100M annually untuk development
    • Timeline: Konstruksi 2026-2027, operasi 2028, full ramp 2029
    • Margin potential: 35-45% (high-margin recurring)
    • Government backing: Aligned dengan nasional waste management agenda

Strategic Rationale:

Government Support Explicit:

  • Indonesia waste management crisis (daily waste generation ~67M ton, limited landfill capacity)
  • Government initiative untuk divert waste ke energy production
  • Policy support untuk WtE projects (tariff guarantee, waste supply guaranteed)

Market Opportunity:

  • Indonesia WtE capacity: Currently minimal (~5% vs developed countries 30%+)
  • Potential: Dozens of plants needed nationally (Raskha LNG + energy transition agenda)
  • OASA first-mover positioning untuk regional WtE player

🟡 Capex Plan Aggressive:

  • 2026: >Rp 100M (project prep, land, design)
  • 2027: >Rp 200M (construction phase)
  • 2028+: Operational (revenue generation)
  • Total estimated capex: Rp 400-600M+ untuk Tangerang + other projects

Financing Plan:

  • Private placement approved (Sept 2025) - 10% dilution untuk capex + working capital
  • Bank financing expected 2026+ (capex acceleration)
  • Risk: Dilutive equity financing (shareholder dilution ongoing)

C. Industri Landscape & Kompetisih3

Waste-to-Energy Industry Indonesia:

KompetitorScalePosition
OASA (PERSADA)Small but first-moverTangerang PSEL only
International playersLargeLimited presence in Indonesia
Regional playersMediumEarly stage (few operational)

OASA Positioning (Weak but Strategic):

First-mover advantage - Nias FSRU era (comparison: GTSI, HUMI) vs WtE (OASA first regional player) ✓ Government partnership - Direct support from ESDM, local govt ✓ Technology alignment - WtE aligned dengan national waste management master plan

🔴 Weaknesses:

  • Financially weak (loss-making, negative OCF)
  • Scale too small (single project focus)
  • Execution risk high (no operational WtE track record)
  • Capital constrained (dilutive financing only option)

🟡 Opportunities:

  • Dozens of potential WtE sites nationally (Indonesia-wide expansion)
  • Government tenders for waste management contracts (recurring revenue)
  • International ESG investors interest dalam clean energy plays
  • Merger/acquisition potential (strategic buyer in energy sector)

🔴 Threats:

  • Energy transition long-term (waste demand structural but carbon eventually decline)
  • Project execution delays (2028 timeline aggressive)
  • Capex cost inflation (construction cost may exceed projections)
  • Regulatory changes (tariff guarantee not certain)
  • International competition (global WtE player entry)

TAHAP 2: ANALISIS FUNDAMENTAL - 5 PILARh2

PILAR 1: PROFITABILITAS & MARGINh3

Status: 🔴 LOSS-MAKING, DEEPLY NEGATIVE FUNDAMENTAL, NO PROFITABILITY PATH NEAR-TERM

MarginK3 20259M 2025TTM2024Trend
Margin Kotor25,26%Low-17%Negative↑ K3 improving
Margin Operasi31,25%LowNegativeNegative↑ K3 improving
Margin Bersih35,07%-0,1%-162%Negative↑ K3 swing

🔴 TTM margin -162% - DEEPLY UNPROFITABLE overall.

🟡 K3 margin positive - But from one-time carry-over high-margin projects (not sustainable operational).

🔴 Trend deceptive - K3 positive swing misleading (projects ending, not real operational improvement).

Sustainable Profitability?

🔴 NO - NOT SUSTAINABLE NEAR-TERM:

  • Current operational base (Telesys construction) declining
  • Biomassa segment nascent (revenue minimal)
  • WtE only generates revenue 2028+ (3+ years away)
  • Until 2028, company will remain loss-making from core operations

PILAR 2: ARUS KAS & PEMBIAYAANh3

Status: 🔴 NEGATIVE CASH FLOW, OPERATIONAL BURNING, CRITICAL RISK

KomponenNilai
OCF (TTM)(25) Miliar ❌
Capex (TTM)0 (minimal)
FCF (TTM)24 Miliar
Financing (TTM)(42) Miliar

🔴 OCF negative Rp (25)M - OPERATIONAL CASH BURNING (core problem).

🟡 FCF positive Rp 24M tapi misleading (from financing/investing, not sustainable).

🔴 Financing negative Rp (42)M - paying back obligations, not generating cash.

🔴 Unsustainable: Company will run out of cash if no new financing.


PILAR 3: UTANG & SOLVABILITASh3

Status: 🟡 LOW LEVERAGE POSITIVE, BUT ALTMAN DISTRESS SIGNAL CRITICAL

MetrikNilaiStatus
D/E Ratio0,03x✓ Very low
Debt/Assets2,5%✓ Minimal
Altman Score8,19🔴 DISTRESS
Interest Coverage-15,12🔴 CANNOT PAY
Net Cash27 Miliar✓ Positive

D/E 0,03x very low - virtually no debt leverage.

Net cash Rp 27M positive - has cash buffer.

🔴 Altman 8,19 = FINANCIAL DISTRESS ZONE - despite low debt, company shows distress signals (loss-making, negative cash generation).

🔴 Interest coverage negative - cannot service any debt from operations.

Conclusion: Low leverage positive, but operational distress is the real problem (not debt).


PILAR 4: HASIL INVESTASI & RETURNh3

Status: 🔴 NEGATIVE RETURNS, VALUE DESTRUCTION

MetrikNilai
ROE-12,99%
ROA-11,50%
ROIC-8,06%

🔴 ALL NEGATIVE - destroying shareholder capital.

Forward path: If WtE materializes 2028+ with 40% margins, ROE could reach 15-20% by 2030-2032. But this requires: (1) successful execution, (2) no delays, (3) government support continuous. Probability < 40%.


PILAR 5: DIVIDEN & RETURN PEMEGANG SAHAMh3

Status: 🔴 NO DIVIDEN, PURE SPECULATION

TahunDividen
2025-
2024-
TTM-

🔴 NO DIVIDEN - 100% speculation on WtE upside.

Dividen outlook: Not until 2030+ (WtE ramp, profitability).


RINGKASAN 5 PILARh2

PilarStatusNilai
1. Profitabilitas🔴 Loss, no near-term path0.5/5
2. Arus Kas🔴 Negative OCF, unsustainable0.5/5
3. Utang & Solvabilitas🟡 Low debt, but Altman distress2/5
4. Return Investasi🔴 All negative0/5
5. Dividen🔴 None0/5
RATA-RATA🔴 VERY POOR0.6/5

Penilaian Umum: Perusahaan dalam kondisi financial distress with long-term transformation bet - Loss-making, negative cash flow, destroying value. Satu-satunya harapan: WtE project delivery 2028+ dengan successful execution. Ini adalah PURE SPECULATION dengan reward potential tapi downside catastrophic jika project delays.


TAHAP 3: VALUASI & FAIR VALUEh2

Fair Value Estimation:

ModelFair Value
EV/EBITDAN/A (negative EBITDA)
P/B DistressRp 50-75 (0,5-0,8x)
DCF TurnaroundRp 100-150 (if WtE success)
ConsensusRp 50-150
Current PriceRp 242
Assessment🔴 OVERVALUED 60-80%

TAHAP 4: SKENARIO 2-TAHUNh2

ScenarioProbReturnTarget
Bull25%+150%Rp 600+
Base35%-50%Rp 120
Bear40%-85%Rp 35
Expected-40%Rp 145

Expected return: -40% (probability-weighted) - NEGATIVE with heavy downside.


REKOMENDASI INVESTASIh2

RATING: 🔴 AVOID / HOLD (Very High Risk)h3

Untuk investor baru:JANGAN BELI di Rp 242

Alasan:

  • Loss-making fundamental TTM
  • Negative cash flow (unsustainable)
  • Valuation 60-80% overpriced
  • Execution risk 3+ tahun (too uncertain)
  • Expected return -40% (negative probability-weighted)

HANYA untuk speculative traders:

  • IF percaya WtE akan berhasil 2028
  • AND willing to lose 80%
  • AND can hold 3+ tahun
  • Entry: Rp 100-150 MAKSIMAL (wait for crash)

Stop-Loss: Rp 150 (if break below, exit)
Profit-Taking: Rp 500-600 (only if WtE news positive)
Timeline: 3-5 tahun minimum


KESIMPULANh2

OASA adalah AVOID saham pada harga Rp 242. Fundamental sangat lemah (loss, negative cash), valuasi overpriced (P/S 32,80x), dan execution uncertainty tinggi. Green energy story menarik secara narrative, tapi probability of success < 40% dan risk/reward UNFAVORABLE.

Better entry: Rp 100-150 jika ingin speculate pada WtE turnaround.


Analisis dibuat 29 Desember 2025 berdasarkan Q3 2025 data, manajemen update Desember 2025 (public expose), danrencana strategis WtE project.

Comments

Posts recommended based on similar topics and analysis focus