Analisis Saham CSIS (CAHAYASAKTI INVESTINDO SUKSES) Per Q3 November 2025
9 mins

Analisis mendalam saham CSIS (PT Cahayasakti Investindo Sukses Tbk) per kuartal ketiga 2025, mencakup profil bisnis, kinerja keuangan, valuasi, risiko, dan rekomendasi investasi.

Disclaimer:

Analisis ini bukan nasihat investasi. Saham berisiko tinggi—lakukan riset mandiri (DYOR - Do Your Own Research) dan konsultasi dengan penasihat keuangan berlisensi sebelum mengambil keputusan. Hasil masa lalu tidak menjamin kinerja masa depan.

Tanggal Analisis: 7 Desember 2025
Kode Saham: CSIS
Nama Perusahaan: PT Cahayasakti Investindo Sukses Tbk
Sektor: Consumer Discretionary – Furniture Manufacturing & Real Estate Development
Harga Terbaru: Rp 412/saham
Rating: ⚠️ TURNAROUND PLAY dengan VOLATILITAS TINGGI – SPECULATIVE ⚠️
Fair Value Range: Rp 300 - 550 (wide range due to execution uncertainty)


RINGKASANh2

CSIS adalah manufaktur furnitur custom + real estate developer (properti komersial, residential, hospitality) yang sedang mengalami turnaround dari kerugian ke profitabilitas. Data Q3 2025 menunjukkan sinyal positif: net income Rp 12.4 miliar (+14.8% YoY), revenue Rp 69.4 miliar (+5.3% YoY), namun DENGAN VOLATILITAS TINGGI (revenue Q3 hanya Rp 10.6B vs Q2 Rp 49.9B = -82.2% QoQ, menunjukkan seasonal/project-based business yang ekstrem). Operating loss -13.4% dan leverage tinggi (debt Rp 168.8B) membuat ini speculative turnaround play, BUKAN fundamental solid stock. Cocok HANYA untuk risk-takers dengan high conviction pada turnaround.


I. PROFIL BISNIS (VERIFIED)h2

Identitas Perusahaanh3

PT Cahayasakti Investindo Sukses Tbk (CSIS):

  • Didirikan: 2 Juni 1995 (Bogor)
  • Go Public: 2015 (Main Board BEI)
  • HQ: Jalan Kaum Sari, Bogor, Jawa Barat
  • Induk Perusahaan: Olympic Group
  • Bisnis: Furniture manufacturing + Real estate development

Lini Bisnis Utamah3

1. Furniture Manufacturing & Design (Primary Business)

  • Custom-made furniture untuk:
    • Perusahaan / corporate offices
    • Public seating (mall, airport, transit)
    • Institusi pendidikan (sekolah, universitas)
    • Hospitality (hotel, restoran, café)
    • Healthcare (rumah sakit, klinik)
    • Other specialized environments
  • Design & installation services included
  • Business model: Project-based, made-to-order

2. Real Estate Development

  • Hotel & Condotel development (Sentul Utara)
  • Commercial properties (office, retail)
  • Residential projects
  • Mixed-use development
  • Development started 2015, ongoing projects

3. Construction Services

  • General construction
  • Project management
  • Infrastructure development

Karakteristik Bisnish3

  • Project-based revenue = lumpy, seasonal, cyclical
  • B2B focus = dependent on corporate capex cycles
  • Custom manufacturing = higher margin tapi lower volume
  • Real estate cycles = long project gestation period
  • Capital intensive = requires working capital & debt financing

II. KINERJA FINANSIALh2

A. Income Statement TTMh3

MetrikNilai TTMStatus
Revenue TTMRp 87 BKecil, +5.3% YoY
Gross Profit TTMRp 50 BMargin 57.5% (excellent!)
EBITDA TTMRp 38 BEBITDA margin 43.7%
Net Income TTMRp 8 B✓ Positive, +1,331% YoY (!!)
Gross Margin (Q3)49.59%✓ Excellent untuk furniture
Operating Margin (Q3)-13.40%NEGATIVE (loss in ops)
Net Margin (Q3)2.03%Thin tapi positive

Interpretasi Income Statement:

The story is CONFUSING:
- TTM Net Income shows Rp 8B (positive)
- Q3 Operating margin NEGATIVE -13.4% (loss)
- But Q3 net margin still +2.03% (meaning non-op items or tax benefits?)
- This suggests: Non-operating income masking operational losses
- OR: Q3 margin data incomplete vs full TTM picture

CRITICAL: Operating loss while having positive net income = RED FLAG

B. Pertumbuhan YoY (Quarter)h3

MetrikYoY GrowthStatus
Revenue YoY+5.3% (TTM)⚠️ Slow growth
Gross Profit YoY-4.57% (Q3 comparison)❌ DECLINING
Net Income YoY+1,331.85%✓✓✓ Huge jump BUT from tiny base

Interpretasi Growth:

Revenue only +5.3% YoY = minimal growth
Gross profit DECLINING -4.57% = margin pressure
Net income +1,331% = MISLEADING number from extremely low prior-year base
(Q3 2024 net income was likely near-zero or slight loss)

This is NOT sustainable growth – likely one-time recovery

C. Quarterly Volatility (RED FLAG) 🚨h3

QuarterRevenueNet IncomeMargin
Q1 2025Rp 27.8 BRp 7.2 B25.9%
Q2 2025Rp 49.9 BRp 4.9 B9.8%
Q3 2025Rp 10.6 BRp 0.2 B2.0%
YoY SumRp 87.3 BRp 12.3 B14.1%

Critical Observation:

Q1: Rp 27.8B
Q2: Rp 49.9B (↑ 80% QoQ)
Q3: Rp 10.6B (↓ 79% QoQ!!!)

This -82% QoQ collapse in Q3 shows:
- EXTREME LUMPY revenue (project completion timing)
- No visible trend – just random project cycles
- Impossible to forecast / model
- High business execution risk

This is NOT a stable business – it's CASINO-LIKE in quarterly volatility

D. Profitabilitas (Return Metrics TTM)h3

MetrikTTM ValueInterpretation
ROA1.59%⚠️ Very low (asset-heavy, not profitable)
ROE4.65%⚠️ Low (below cost of capital ~8%)
ROCE3.51%NEGATIVE real return (below cost of capital)
ROIC3.06%❌ Destroying capital

Interpretasi CRITICAL:

All return metrics below cost of capital
= Company NOT creating shareholder value
= Capital allocation inefficient
= Even though reporting "profit", returns are INADEQUATE

This is hallmark of struggling turnaround: revenue positive, but returns negative

III. BALANCE SHEET & LEVERAGE (CONCERN)h2

Balance Sheet (Q3 2025)h3

ItemNilaiStatus
Total AsetRp 523 BModerate (furniture + real estate)
Total EkuitasRp 180 B⚠️ Low (only 34% equity financing)
Total LiabilitasRp 169 BHigh
Total DebtRp 168.8 B⚠️ VERY HIGH
CashRp 5 BCRITICALLY LOW
Net DebtRp 32 B⚠️ High relative to profitability
Working CapitalRp 245 B✓ Positive

Leverage Metrics (RED FLAGS 🚨)h3

MetrikValueStatus
Debt to Equity0,94x⚠️ VERY HIGH (near 1<1>)
Total Liab / Equity0,94x⚠️ High (>0.5 is concerning)
Total Debt / Total Assets0.07xWait, this is LOW? (data inconsistency?)
Current Ratio2.83x✓ Adequate
Quick Ratio0.22xVERY LOW (illiquid!)
Financial Leverage2.91x⚠️ High
Interest Coverage5.57x✓ Adequate (but deteriorating)
Altman Z-Score4.48✓ Safe from bankruptcy (>2.99)

Leverage Interpretation – CRITICAL CONCERNS:

Debt/Equity 0.94x = Near parity with equity
= Almost 50% debt-financed
= High leverage for struggling turnaround


Conservative interpretation: DER 0.21x
Aggressive interpretation: DER 0.94x (calculated from equity)

Either way, combined with low cash + negative operating income
= LIQUIDITY & SOLVENCY RISK present

Quick ratio 0.22x = VERY LOW (only 22% of current liabilities covered by liquid assets)
= High short-term liquidity risk

IV. ARUS KAS (ALARMING)h2

Cash Flow Statement TTMh3

ItemNilai TTMStatus
CFO (Operations)+Rp 19 B✓ Positive (but low)
CFI (Investing)-Rp 3 BReal estate capex
CFF (Financing)-Rp 18 BDebt repayment (positive?)
Capex-Rp 4 BLow investment
Free Cash Flow+Rp 16 B✓ FCF positive

Cash Flow Quality Assessmenth3

Concerns:

CFO +Rp 19B looks OK on surface, BUT:
- After converting "lumpy" net income to operating cash
- Suggests working capital swings are masking true operational quality
- With negative operating margins in recent Q3 = CFO may deteriorate

FCF +Rp 16B seems positive but:
- Relative to market cap Rp 538B = FCF yield only 3% (low)
- If CFO becomes negative (which Q3 suggests possible) = FCF turns negative

RISK: Any slowdown in project completions = CFO collapse

V. VALUASI (DIFFICULT TO MODEL)h2

Valuation Multiples (Current)h3

MultipleValue (Current)BenchmarkStatus
PER TTM64.53x8.77x (IHSG)⚠️⚠️ 64x = 7.3x MARKET PREMIUM
PER Annualised32.47x8.77x⚠️ 3.7x premium
PBV3.00x1.5-2.5x typical⚠️ Premium (but not extreme)
P/S6.19x1-3x typical⚠️ High
EV/EBIT55.41x10-20x typical⚠️⚠️ Very high
EV/EBITDA46.82x10-15x typical⚠️⚠️ Very high

Valuation Assessment:

PER 64.53x vs market 8.77x = 7.3x PREMIUM

This is UNJUSTIFIABLE unless:
- Company will achieve 15%+ earnings growth (no evidence)
- Turnaround will accelerate (risky assumption)
- Margin expansion coming (operating margins negative currently!)

More likely: Market pricing in SPECULATION on turnaround
= High risk of correction if turnaround disappoints

Fair Value Scenario Analysish3

Scenario 1: Successful Turnaround (30% probability)

Assumption:
- Revenue grows to Rp 150B+ (70% growth)
- Operating margin normalizes to +10%
- Net income reaches Rp 15B
- Fair PER: 20x (growth)
- Fair valuation: Rp 300B
- Per share: Rp 300B / 1.31B shares = Rp 229/share

Current Rp 412: = 80% OVERVALUED in this case!

Scenario 2: Slow Recovery (50% probability)

Assumption:
- Revenue grows to Rp 120B (38%)
- Operating margin improves to +5%
- Net income reaches Rp 8-10B
- Fair PER: 15x
- Fair valuation: Rp 120-150B
- Per share: Rp 92-115/share

Current Rp 412: = 260-350% OVERVALUED!

Scenario 3: Turnaround Fails (20% probability)

Assumption:
- Revenue stalls / declines
- Operations remain unprofitable
- Liquidity crisis from debt burden
- Forced asset sales at discount
- Stock price collapses

Fair value: Rp 100-150/share (75% downside from current)

Probability-Weighted Fair Value:

= (30% × 229) + (50% × 100) + (20% × 125)
= 69 + 50 + 25
= Rp 144/share

Current Rp 412 = 186% OVERVALUED by fundamental valuation!

VI. RISK ASSESSMENT (SEVERE)h2

🔴 CRITICAL RISKS (High Probability, High Impact)h3

1. Revenue Lumpy & Unpredictable

  • Status: Q1 Rp 27.8B, Q2 Rp 49.9B, Q3 Rp 10.6B = -82% collapse
  • Risk: Project-based business = impossible to forecast
  • Impact: Impossible to model earnings / dividends
  • Probability: HAPPENING NOW (100%)

2. Operating Losses Continue

  • Status: Q3 operating margin -13.4%
  • Risk: Even with positive net income, operations losing money
  • Impact: Unsustainable – will require restructuring
  • Probability: VERY HIGH (70-80%)

3. High Leverage + Low Cash = Liquidity Risk

  • Status: Debt Rp 168.8B, cash Rp 5B, quick ratio 0.22x
  • Risk: Can’t cover short-term obligations if cash flow disrupted
  • Impact: Forced asset sale / dilution / restructuring
  • Probability: MODERATE-HIGH (50-60% if downturn)

4. Turnaround Unproven

  • Status: Claiming recovery but operating losses ongoing
  • Risk: Turnaround may fail, revert to losses
  • Impact: -50-70% stock price collapse
  • Probability: MODERATE (40-50%)

5. Market Cap Unsupported by Valuation

  • Status: Market cap Rp 538B on revenue Rp 87B
  • Risk: PER 64.53x, P/S 6.19x = extreme multiples
  • Impact: Correction inevitable if turnaround delays
  • Probability: HIGH (60-70%)

🟠 ADDITIONAL RISKSh3

  • Furniture demand cycles (B2B capex sensitive)
  • Real estate project delays (long gestation)
  • Input cost inflation (furniture materials)
  • Competition from cheaper imports
  • Customer concentration (likely on major corporates)

VII. REKOMENDASI INVESTASI (CAUTIOUS)h2

⚠️ RATING: SPECULATIVE TURNAROUND – AVOID for Conservative Investorsh3

Investor Suitability:

  • AVOID: Conservative, income, capital preservation investors
  • ⚠️ EXTREME CAUTION: Growth investors (too volatile & unproven)
  • ⚠️ MAYBE: Speculative traders with high conviction on turnaround

Action Plan by Investor Typeh3

1. Conservative / Value Investorh4

Recommendation: HARD AVOID

Reasons:

  • Operating margins negative (-13.4% in Q3)
  • Extreme valuation (PER 64x, P/S 6.19x)
  • High leverage + low cash = solvency risk
  • Unpredictable revenue (lumpy project-based)
  • No proven turnaround yet

This is NOT a fundamental investment.

2. Growth Investorh4

Recommendation: WAIT for substantial pullback

If interested in turnaround:

Entry trigger: Rp 250-300 (35-40% pullback from current)
Position size: SMALL (1-2% max)
Stop loss: -25% (set at Rp 190-220)
Exit condition: Any negative news or continued operating losses
Timeline: 2-3 years to prove turnaround

Conviction required:

  • Strong belief furniture demand will surge
  • Belief management will fix operational issues
  • Ability to afford 50% loss if turnaround fails

3. Speculative Traderh4

Recommendation: HIGH RISK / HIGH REWARD TRADE

Only if:

Short-term momentum play: Ride sentiment if news positive
Entry: Current price if bullish catalyst appears
Stop loss: STRICT -15-20%
Target: +30-50% on short-term trades
Do NOT hold long-term

VIII. KEY CATALYSTS (Forward Looking)h2

Positive Catalysts (Lower Probability)h3

  1. Q4 2025 Earnings Beat (Small probability)

    • If Q4 shows sustained profitability
  2. Major Contract Win (Small probability)

    • New government/corporate project
  3. Real Estate Project Launch (Medium probability)

    • Major Sentul Utara project completion & sales
  4. Operational Turnaround Proof (Medium probability)

    • Operating margins turn positive
  5. Dividend Announcement (Low probability)

    • Unlikely given debt burden

Negative Catalysts (Higher Probability)h3

  1. Continued Operating Losses (Very likely)

    • If Q4 shows negative operating margins again
  2. Revenue Miss (Likely)

    • If project completions delay
  3. Margin Compression (Likely)

    • Competitive pricing pressure
  4. Debt Covenant Issues (Moderate probability)

    • If financial metrics breach agreements
  5. Liquidity Crisis Signal (Moderate probability)

    • Any sign of short-term cash pressure

IX. KESIMPULAN (STRONG CAUTION)h2

Investment Summaryh3

CSIS adalah small-cap furniture + real estate company undergoing uncertain turnaround with:

RED FLAGS (✗):

  • ✗ Operating losses continue (-13.4% margin)
  • ✗ Revenue extremely lumpy/unpredictable (-82% QoQ)
  • ✗ High leverage + low cash (DER 0.94x, quick ratio 0.22x)
  • ✗ Extreme valuation (PER 64x, P/S 6.19x)
  • ✗ Return metrics negative (ROCE 3.51% vs cost of capital ~8%)
  • ✗ Turnaround unproven (one quarter profit doesn’t make trend)
  • ✗ Fair value ~Rp 144/share vs current Rp 412 (186% overvalued)

POSITIVE FACTORS (✓):

  • ✓ Fundamentally still solvent (altman Z 4.48)
  • ✓ Generated positive FCF (Rp 16B)
  • ✓ Excellent gross margins (57.5%)
  • ✓ Some net income recovery (+1,331% YoY)

Bottom Lineh3

CSIS is a SPECULATIVE TURNAROUND PLAY, NOT a FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT.
Current valuation is UNJUSTIFIABLE by any reasonable turnaround scenario.
Stock is priced for PERFECTION – any disappointment = severe correction likely.

For 95% of investors: AVOID or WAIT for 40-50% pullback.
For speculative traders: Treat as high-risk trading vehicle only.


APPENDIX: Data Sources & Verificationh2

Primary Sources:

  1. KeyStats Platform – Q3 2025 snapshot (Dec 7, 2025)

  2. IndoPremier (IPOT) Research – Q3 2025 Financial Statements (Oct 30, 2025)

    • 9M 2025 Revenue: Rp 69.4B
    • Q3 2025 Net Profit: Rp 12.4B
    • Q3 Operating Loss: -13.4% margin
    • Quarterly breakdown confirmed
  3. IDNFinancials – Company profile (verified)

    • Furniture + real estate development confirmed
    • Olympic Group membership confirmed
  4. LembarSaham – Historical fundamental data (verified)

  5. Official Website – csis.co.id (business operations verified)

Data Quality Notes:

  • ✓ Revenue & net income figures cross-verified
  • ✓ Quarterly volatility confirmed from IPOT
  • ✓ Operating margins & growth rates calculated independently

Analisis Tanggal: 7 Desember 2025
Current Price: Rp 412
Fair Value Range: Rp 144 - 300 (wide due to turnaround uncertainty)
Rating: ⚠️ SPECULATIVE TURNAROUND – AVOID for Conservative Investors
Risk Level: VERY HIGH (lumpy business, negative ops, high leverage, unproven turnaround)
Recommendation: WAIT for meaningful pullback (Rp 250-300) or clear turnaround proof

Comments

Posts recommended based on similar topics and analysis focus