Analisis Saham PT Maharaksa Biru Energi Tbk (OASA) Per Q3 2025 (Update Desember)
Analisis mendalam saham OASA per kuartal 3 2025 dengan update manajemen Desember 2025. Fokus pada transformasi bisnis ke energi terbarukan, kinerja keuangan, risiko, dan kesimpulan analisis.
Disclaimer:
Analisis ini adalah opini edukasi, bukan nasihat atau rekomendasi investasi. Kami tidak menerima komisi maupun afiliasi dari emiten yang dibahas. Saham berisiko tinggi—lakukan riset mandiri (DYOR - Do Your Own Research) dan konsultasi dengan penasihat keuangan berlisensi sebelum mengambil keputusan. Hasil masa lalu tidak menjamin kinerja masa depan.
Tanggal Analisis: 29 Desember 2025
Harga Saat Ini: Rp 242 per lembar
Ticker: OASA (Bursa Efek Indonesia)
Nama Perusahaan: PT Maharaksa Biru Energi Tbk
Sektor: Energi Terbarukan & Konstruksi - Biomassa, Waste-to-Energy (WtE), Engineering & Construction Services
Nilai Pasar: Rp 1.536 Miliar
Jumlah Saham Beredar: 6,35 Miliar lembar
Overviewh2
OASA adalah perusahaan transformasi dari jasa konstruksi telco tower menuju pemain energi terbarukan (biomassa, waste-to-energy). Kondisi finansial kritis: TTM loss Rp (77)M, margin negatif -162%, OCF negative Rp (25)M, Altman 8,19 distress zone, interest coverage negative. TAPI momentum positif terlihat: K3 2025 swing profit Rp 2,1M, capex 2025 minimal (Rp < 500jt) untuk persiapan, capex 2026 akan >Rp 100M untuk PSEL project. Strategi: Waste-to-Energy plant di Tangerang Selatan target operasi 2028, full ramp 2029. Harga Rp 242 mencerminkan narasi “green energy + government support”, meski eksekusinya sangat uncertain dan risiko finansial tinggi.
Status Kini (Data Kuartal 3 2025 & Update Manajemen Desember 2025):
| Item | Nilai | Keterangan |
|---|---|---|
| Pendapatan TTM (Est) | Rp 47 Miliar | Low, dari carry-over & biomassa |
| Laba Kotor TTM | Rp (8) Miliar | Negative |
| EBITDA TTM | Rp (38) Miliar | NEGATIVE EBITDA ❌ |
| Laba Bersih TTM | Rp (77) Miliar | LOSS ❌ |
| Margin Bersih TTM | -162% | DEEPLY NEGATIVE |
| K3 2025 Profit | Rp 2,1 Miliar | Swing positive (momentum) |
| Arus Kas Operasi TTM | Rp (25) Miliar | NEGATIVE ❌ |
| Arus Kas Bebas TTM | Rp 24 Miliar | Positive tapi misleading |
| Capex 2025 | < Rp 500 Juta | Minimal (project prep stage) |
| Capex 2026 Plan | >Rp 100 Miliar | PSEL project begins |
| D/E Ratio | 0,03x | Very low (asset-light) |
| Altman Score | 8,19 | DISTRESS ZONE ❌ |
Profil Transformasi & Risiko:
- 🔴 Loss-making fundamental - TTM loss Rp (77)M, negative EBITDA, OCF negative (operasional broken)
- 🟡 Swing profit K3 2025 - Rp 2,1M dari carry-over projects (momentum but temporary)
- 🔴 Negative cash flow - Burning cash from operations (unsustainable without financing)
- 🟡 Government support clear - Waste-to-Energy project aligned dengan national waste management agenda
- 🟡 Capex plan significant - 2026+ >Rp 100M annually untuk PSEL Tangerang Selatan
- 🔴 Execution risk extreme - 3+ tahun untuk project operational (2028), lots can go wrong
- 🟡 Dilution planned - Private placement untuk capex financing (shareholder dilution risk)
- 🟡 Price momentum - Up +76,64% 3 tahun (speculation, not fundamental)
Kesimpulan Awal: OASA adalah extremely risky transformation story dengan negative fundamentals sekarang tapi potential upside jika government waste-to-energy agenda materializes - perusahaan yang loss-making, cash burning, tapi strategically positioning untuk green energy boom. Profil risikonya sangat tinggi dan volatilitasnya mengikuti kepastian eksekusi proyek waste-to-energy pemerintah.
TAHAP 1: VERIFIKASI DATA & PENILAIAN AWALh2
A. Data Keuangan dari Lampiran (Per 29 Desember 2025)h3
- Revenue TTM Rp 47M ÷ Saham 6,35B = Rp 7,38 per saham RPS (matches Revenue Per Share TTM 7,38) ✓
- Net loss Rp (77)M ÷ Saham 6,35B = Rp (12,10) per saham EPS (matches approx -12,10) ✓
✓ Konversi VERIFIED BENAR
Laporan Laba Rugi (TTM):
| Metrik | TTM | K3 2025 | K3 2024 | K2 2025 | K1 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pendapatan | 47 Miliar | ~7-10M (est) | 0 | (180)M | (8)M |
| Laba Kotor | (8) Miliar | Positive swing | Loss | Loss | Loss |
| Laba Bersih | (77) Miliar | 2,1 Miliar ✓ | (435)M | (7)M loss | (8)M |
⚠️ TTM loss Rp (77)M - company deeply unprofitable overall.
✓ K3 2025 swing positive Rp 2,1M - dari carry-over konstruksi (one-time item).
🔴 K2 2025 loss Rp (180)M extreme - negative spike (unusual).
Metrik Per Saham:
| Metrik | Nilai |
|---|---|
| EPS (TTM) | Rp (12,10) |
| EPS (Annual) | Rp (2,80) |
| Revenue Per Share (TTM) | Rp 7,38 |
| Kas Per Saham | Rp 6,85 |
| Nilai Buku Per Saham | Rp 93,14 |
| FCF Per Saham (TTM) | Rp 3,81 |
🔴 EPS negative Rp (12,10) → Harga Rp 242 / EPS (-12,10) = NEGATIVE P/E (loss company).
🟡 P/B Rp 242 / Rp 93,14 book = 2,60x - High premium untuk loss company (speculation).
🔴 FCF positive Rp 24M tapi misleading (dari financing activities, not operational).
Neraca (Kuartal 3 2025):
| Item | Nilai (Rp Miliar) |
|---|---|
| Kas | 44 Miliar |
| Total Aset | 668 Miliar |
| Total Liabilitas | 79 Miliar |
| Total Ekuitas | 591 Miliar |
| Utang Jangka Panjang | 0 (none) |
| Utang Jangka Pendek | 17 Miliar |
| Total Utang | 17 Miliar |
| Net Cash | 27 Miliar (positive!) |
| Modal Kerja | 114 Miliar |
✓ Net cash position Rp 27M - POSITIVE (bright spot).
✓ D/E 0,03x very low - minimal leverage (conservative balance sheet).
✓ Working capital Rp 114M - adequate short-term buffer.
🟡 Total aset hanya Rp 668M - small company, asset-light model.
Arus Kas (TTM):
| Komponen | Rp Miliar |
|---|---|
| Arus dari Operasi | (25) ❌ |
| Arus dari Investasi | 50 |
| Arus Kas Bebas | 24 ✓ |
| Arus dari Pendanaan | (42) |
🔴 OCF negative Rp (25)M - operational cash burning.
🟡 FCF positive Rp 24M tapi dari investing activities (financing, not sustainable).
🔴 Financing negative Rp (42)M - cash outflow (paying back obligations).
Valuasi (pada harga Rp 242):
| Metrik | Nilai | Penilaian |
|---|---|---|
| P/E (TTM) | NEGATIVE | 🔴 Loss (N/A) |
| P/B | 2,60x | 🔴 HIGH untuk loss company |
| P/S | 32,80x | 🔴 EXTREMELY HIGH |
| EV/EBITDA | (40,11) | 🔴 Negative (loss) |
| Price-to-FCF | 63,45x | 🔴 VERY HIGH |
🔴 VALUATION EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE FOR LOSS-MAKING COMPANY - P/S 32,80x absurd, P/B 2,60x high for fundamentally broken company.
Market pricing in MASSIVE transformation potential.
Profitabilitas (Kuartal 3 2025):
| Margin | % |
|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 25,26% |
| Operating Margin | 31,25% |
| Net Profit Margin | 35,07% |
⚠️ Margins positive in K3 but this is from one-time carry-over projects (high margin ending), not sustainable.
Pertumbuhan:
| Metrik | % YoY |
|---|---|
| Revenue | -42,38% ❌ |
| Gross Profit | -73,54% ❌ |
| Net Income | 595,71% ✓ (from base loss) |
🔴 Revenue declining -42% YoY - shrinking operational base.
✓ Net income +595% - but from swing out of bigger loss (not meaningful).
Kesehatan Keuangan:
| Metrik | Nilai | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2,84x | ✓ Good |
| Quick Ratio | 2,84x | ✓ Good |
| D/E | 0,03x | ✓ Very low |
| Interest Coverage | -15,12 | 🔴 NEGATIVE |
| Altman Score | 8,19 | 🔴 DISTRESS |
| FCF Quarter | (36) Miliar | 🔴 Negative |
🔴 Altman 8,19 = FINANCIAL DISTRESS ZONE - company in financial difficulty (despite positive net cash position).
🔴 Interest coverage negative - cannot service any debt from earnings.
✓ Current ratio 2,84x good - short-term liquidity ok.
Efektivitas Manajemen:
| Metrik | Nilai |
|---|---|
| ROA | -11,50% |
| ROE | -12,99% |
| ROIC | -8,06% |
🔴 ALL RETURNS NEGATIVE - destroying shareholder value.
B. Konteks Operasional & Strategi Transformasih3
Portfolio Bisnis OASA:
-
Konstruksi & Jasa Engineering (Legacy/Declining)
- PT Telesys Indonesia (anak usaha) - jasa konsultansi & konstruksi telco tower
- Kontribusi 2025: Terbesar dari carry-over 2024 projects
- Margin: ~25-30% historis
- Trend: Declining (telco tower saturated, market mature)
-
Biomassa (Growing But Small)
- PT Mentari Biru Biomassa - biomassa energy
- Produk: Wood pellet, biomassa power
- 2025 kontribusi: Small (capex minimal Rp < 500j)
- Margin: Expected 15-20% (better than construction)
-
Waste-to-Energy (WtE) - STRATEGIC FOCUS
- Proyek PSEL (Pengolahan Sampah Energi Listrik) Tangerang Selatan
- Deskripsi: Plant pengolahan limbah menjadi energi listrik
- Capex 2026+: >Rp 100M annually untuk development
- Timeline: Konstruksi 2026-2027, operasi 2028, full ramp 2029
- Margin potential: 35-45% (high-margin recurring)
- Government backing: Aligned dengan nasional waste management agenda
Strategic Rationale:
✓ Government Support Explicit:
- Indonesia waste management crisis (daily waste generation ~67M ton, limited landfill capacity)
- Government initiative untuk divert waste ke energy production
- Policy support untuk WtE projects (tariff guarantee, waste supply guaranteed)
✓ Market Opportunity:
- Indonesia WtE capacity: Currently minimal (~5% vs developed countries 30%+)
- Potential: Dozens of plants needed nationally (Raskha LNG + energy transition agenda)
- OASA first-mover positioning untuk regional WtE player
🟡 Capex Plan Aggressive:
- 2026: >Rp 100M (project prep, land, design)
- 2027: >Rp 200M (construction phase)
- 2028+: Operational (revenue generation)
- Total estimated capex: Rp 400-600M+ untuk Tangerang + other projects
Financing Plan:
- Private placement approved (Sept 2025) - 10% dilution untuk capex + working capital
- Bank financing expected 2026+ (capex acceleration)
- Risk: Dilutive equity financing (shareholder dilution ongoing)
C. Industri Landscape & Kompetisih3
Waste-to-Energy Industry Indonesia:
| Kompetitor | Scale | Position |
|---|---|---|
| OASA (PERSADA) | Small but first-mover | Tangerang PSEL only |
| International players | Large | Limited presence in Indonesia |
| Regional players | Medium | Early stage (few operational) |
OASA Positioning (Weak but Strategic):
✓ First-mover advantage - Nias FSRU era (comparison: GTSI, HUMI) vs WtE (OASA first regional player) ✓ Government partnership - Direct support from ESDM, local govt ✓ Technology alignment - WtE aligned dengan national waste management master plan
🔴 Weaknesses:
- Financially weak (loss-making, negative OCF)
- Scale too small (single project focus)
- Execution risk high (no operational WtE track record)
- Capital constrained (dilutive financing only option)
🟡 Opportunities:
- Dozens of potential WtE sites nationally (Indonesia-wide expansion)
- Government tenders for waste management contracts (recurring revenue)
- International ESG investors interest dalam clean energy plays
- Merger/acquisition potential (strategic buyer in energy sector)
🔴 Threats:
- Energy transition long-term (waste demand structural but carbon eventually decline)
- Project execution delays (2028 timeline aggressive)
- Capex cost inflation (construction cost may exceed projections)
- Regulatory changes (tariff guarantee not certain)
- International competition (global WtE player entry)
TAHAP 2: ANALISIS FUNDAMENTAL - 5 PILARh2
PILAR 1: PROFITABILITAS & MARGINh3
Status: 🔴 LOSS-MAKING, DEEPLY NEGATIVE FUNDAMENTAL, NO PROFITABILITY PATH NEAR-TERM
| Margin | K3 2025 | 9M 2025 | TTM | 2024 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margin Kotor | 25,26% | Low | -17% | Negative | ↑ K3 improving |
| Margin Operasi | 31,25% | Low | Negative | Negative | ↑ K3 improving |
| Margin Bersih | 35,07% | -0,1% | -162% | Negative | ↑ K3 swing |
🔴 TTM margin -162% - DEEPLY UNPROFITABLE overall.
🟡 K3 margin positive - But from one-time carry-over high-margin projects (not sustainable operational).
🔴 Trend deceptive - K3 positive swing misleading (projects ending, not real operational improvement).
Sustainable Profitability?
🔴 NO - NOT SUSTAINABLE NEAR-TERM:
- Current operational base (Telesys construction) declining
- Biomassa segment nascent (revenue minimal)
- WtE only generates revenue 2028+ (3+ years away)
- Until 2028, company will remain loss-making from core operations
PILAR 2: ARUS KAS & PEMBIAYAANh3
Status: 🔴 NEGATIVE CASH FLOW, OPERATIONAL BURNING, CRITICAL RISK
| Komponen | Nilai |
|---|---|
| OCF (TTM) | (25) Miliar ❌ |
| Capex (TTM) | 0 (minimal) |
| FCF (TTM) | 24 Miliar ✓ |
| Financing (TTM) | (42) Miliar |
🔴 OCF negative Rp (25)M - OPERATIONAL CASH BURNING (core problem).
🟡 FCF positive Rp 24M tapi misleading (from financing/investing, not sustainable).
🔴 Financing negative Rp (42)M - paying back obligations, not generating cash.
🔴 Unsustainable: Company will run out of cash if no new financing.
PILAR 3: UTANG & SOLVABILITASh3
Status: 🟡 LOW LEVERAGE POSITIVE, BUT ALTMAN DISTRESS SIGNAL CRITICAL
| Metrik | Nilai | Status |
|---|---|---|
| D/E Ratio | 0,03x | ✓ Very low |
| Debt/Assets | 2,5% | ✓ Minimal |
| Altman Score | 8,19 | 🔴 DISTRESS |
| Interest Coverage | -15,12 | 🔴 CANNOT PAY |
| Net Cash | 27 Miliar | ✓ Positive |
✓ D/E 0,03x very low - virtually no debt leverage.
✓ Net cash Rp 27M positive - has cash buffer.
🔴 Altman 8,19 = FINANCIAL DISTRESS ZONE - despite low debt, company shows distress signals (loss-making, negative cash generation).
🔴 Interest coverage negative - cannot service any debt from operations.
Conclusion: Low leverage positive, but operational distress is the real problem (not debt).
PILAR 4: HASIL INVESTASI & RETURNh3
Status: 🔴 NEGATIVE RETURNS, VALUE DESTRUCTION
| Metrik | Nilai |
|---|---|
| ROE | -12,99% |
| ROA | -11,50% |
| ROIC | -8,06% |
🔴 ALL NEGATIVE - destroying shareholder capital.
Forward path: If WtE materializes 2028+ with 40% margins, ROE could reach 15-20% by 2030-2032. But this requires: (1) successful execution, (2) no delays, (3) government support continuous. Probability < 40%.
PILAR 5: DIVIDEN & RETURN PEMEGANG SAHAMh3
Status: 🔴 NO DIVIDEN, PURE SPECULATION
| Tahun | Dividen |
|---|---|
| 2025 | - |
| 2024 | - |
| TTM | - |
🔴 NO DIVIDEN - 100% speculation on WtE upside.
Dividen outlook: Not until 2030+ (WtE ramp, profitability).
RINGKASAN 5 PILARh2
| Pilar | Status | Nilai |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Profitabilitas | 🔴 Loss, no near-term path | 0.5/5 |
| 2. Arus Kas | 🔴 Negative OCF, unsustainable | 0.5/5 |
| 3. Utang & Solvabilitas | 🟡 Low debt, but Altman distress | 2/5 |
| 4. Return Investasi | 🔴 All negative | 0/5 |
| 5. Dividen | 🔴 None | 0/5 |
| RATA-RATA | 🔴 VERY POOR | 0.6/5 |
Penilaian Umum: Perusahaan dalam kondisi financial distress with long-term transformation bet - Loss-making, negative cash flow, destroying value. Satu-satunya harapan: WtE project delivery 2028+ dengan successful execution. Ini adalah PURE SPECULATION dengan reward potential tapi downside catastrophic jika project delays.
TAHAP 3: VALUASI & FAIR VALUEh2
Fair Value Estimation:
| Model | Fair Value |
|---|---|
| EV/EBITDA | N/A (negative EBITDA) |
| P/B Distress | Rp 50-75 (0,5-0,8x) |
| DCF Turnaround | Rp 100-150 (if WtE success) |
| Consensus | Rp 50-150 |
| Current Price | Rp 242 |
| Assessment | 🔴 OVERVALUED 60-80% |
TAHAP 4: SKENARIO 2-TAHUNh2
| Scenario | Prob | Return | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bull | 25% | +150% | Rp 600+ |
| Base | 35% | -50% | Rp 120 |
| Bear | 40% | -85% | Rp 35 |
| Expected | -40% | Rp 145 |
Expected return: -40% (probability-weighted) - NEGATIVE with heavy downside.
Ringkasan & Level Kuncih2
Pada harga Rp 242, valuasi mencerminkan fundamental yang masih sangat lemah (loss-making TTM, negative cash flow, valuasi P/S 32,80x) sekaligus risiko eksekusi proyek WtE yang 3+ tahun ke depan (target operasi 2028). Skenario probability-weighted menunjukkan expected return -40%, dengan zona Rp 100-150 mendekati estimasi fair value distress dan Rp 500-600 mencerminkan skenario di mana berita positif WtE terealisasi.
KESIMPULANh2
Fundamental OASA saat ini sangat lemah (loss, negative cash), valuasi tergolong overpriced relatif fundamental (P/S 32,80x), dan ketidakpastian eksekusi tinggi. Green energy story menarik secara narrative, namun probabilitas keberhasilannya di bawah 40% berdasarkan skenario yang disusun di atas.
Analisis dibuat 29 Desember 2025 berdasarkan Q3 2025 data, manajemen update Desember 2025 (public expose), danrencana strategis WtE project.
Comments